NY REIT focused on non-luxury multi-family and office space with good leases trading at a 6 cap. No debt maturities for a few years out. Significant insider ownership. Good cash on BS-repurchased shares. Trading at... login to read the rest
sure - on alignment/governance, we are in a clear minority position here. Not much cash flow, and a lot flows to management. They probably also have tax sensitivities that differ from minority investors. Not saying they... login to read the rest
Blaueskobalt,
Didn't realize that you posted. Could you expand on 2 and 4? 2 - Is it a function of communications? Not actually having raised the dividend? I was at a NAREIT conference where one of... login to read the rest
Quick glance bear thesis:
Looks like EV is down ~10% over the past year...for resi & office in NYC, that seems like not nearly enough? At least not relative to peers
These guys have had enough time... login to read the rest
What is the bear thesis here? The obvious thing that stands out is that occupancy and rent is down quite a bit. The rent stabilized assets are holding up much better. The market rate/luxury apartments... login to read the rest
north of 15x debt/ebitda?
as I recall you viewed the shopping reits as leveraged at less than half that
I do recognize these are non recourse mortgages, which is why I'm ok w a small position here,
Good stuff (IMO). But these guys are very, very, leveraged, so my question is partly do they get the play the long game (which I think was your point). I think there's a lot of evidence... login to read the rest
any more thoughts on NYC market IRT CLPR? Have been hearing anecdotally that many tenants will be getting rent reductions on renewal, although I believe many of CLPR units are already somewhat below mkt?
seems there's... login to read the rest
I saw the insider buying but felt that refi of Flatbush was way more positive news. It's odd that the price moves this sharply today versus the earnings.
a. Yes, they are in compliance
b. Everything but Clover House. Clover wasn't eligible (wasnt available on that street) and then there was a moratorium in installations. Has been lifted and they are applying to switch... login to read the rest
I believe they went public because they believed that given their capital allocation skills/track record that they could trade at or above NAV. This would allow them to do accretive equity raises over time &... login to read the rest
Byronval, thank you for the idea. I have a few questions, if you do not mind:
a) There is a new natural gas testing requirement in the city starting in 2020. Do you know whehter their... login to read the rest
Hi Byron,
Thanks for the writeup. I have looked at this before, and I agree that it's interesting. Here are a couple points that have held me back (in addition to the liquidity):
why did they go public? ... login to read the rest
Are you sure you want to close this position BERRY PLASTICS GROUP INC?
By closing position, I’m notifying VIC Members that at today’s market price, I no longer am recommending this position.
Flag BERRY PLASTICS GROUP INC for Removal
Are you sure you want to Flag this idea BERRY PLASTICS GROUP INC for removal?
Flagging an idea indicates that the idea does not meet the standards of the club and you believe it should be removed from the site. Once a threshold has been reached the idea will be removed.
You Cannot Submit Message ... Yet
You currently do not have message posting privilages, there are
1 way you can get the privilage.
You can apply for full membership by submitting an investment idea of your own. Or if you are in reactivation status, you need to reactivate your full membership.